As New York City prepares to implement congestion pricing in its central business district (CBD), a unique opportunity emerges to reshape urban mobility. With the potential to reduce vehicle volume by up to 20%, as observed in cities like London and Stockholm, congestion pricing could significantly impact cyclists. While this policy aims to reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality, its implications for cycling infrastructure and safety are profound.

Congestion Pricing and Cycling Infrastructure

The NYC Department of Transportation (DOT) and cycling advocacy groups, such as Transportation Alternatives and Bike New York, emphasize that reduced vehicle volume should create space for better cycling infrastructure. Gaps in the city’s bike network often coincide with areas of heavy traffic, where competition for road space has historically limited protected bike lanes.

For example, crucial sections like Second Avenue between 43rd and 34th Streets and parts of 8th Avenue near the Port Authority lack continuous bike lane protection, forcing cyclists to navigate dangerous traffic conditions. By reallocating space from vehicles to protected bike lanes, the city could create a safer and more accessible network for cyclists, encouraging more people to choose bikes as a primary mode of transportation.

London serves as a precedent: its congestion charge implementation in 2003 coincided with a significant jump in cycling, increasing by 83% over four years. NYC could replicate this success by investing in protected lanes and filling gaps in the existing network.

Check Out Egide Cycling Helmets

For Cyclists who need an upgrade. These handmade leather and carbon fiber helmets are just what the doctor ordered.

Discover Egide

Cyclist Safety in High-Traffic Areas

Data shows a troubling relationship between high-traffic areas and cyclist fatalities. In 2023, NYC experienced the highest cyclist death toll in 24 years, with 30 fatalities. Most of these deaths occurred in collisions with automobiles on streets lacking bike lanes.

The problem is compounded by the proliferation of e-bikes, which accounted for 23 of the 30 fatalities. Many of these incidents were solo accidents, highlighting the challenges of navigating NYC’s often chaotic streets at higher speeds. Advocates argue that better infrastructure—such as wider bike lanes designed to accommodate both traditional and electric bikes—could mitigate these risks.

The Role of Protected Bike Lanes

Physically protected bike lanes are critical to reducing cyclist injuries and fatalities. Data consistently shows that collisions occur most frequently in areas without bike infrastructure. For example, sharrows, which merely designate shared road space for cars and bikes, offer little to no protection.

Trucks were involved in half of the cyclist fatalities in 2023, often during right turns at intersections. Protected intersections with clearer visual cues and slower turning speeds could address this issue. Expanding protected bike lanes, such as those proposed for Flatbush Avenue and the Queensboro Bridge, is essential to reducing these preventable tragedies.

Maximizing the Benefits of Congestion Pricing

Congestion pricing offers NYC a chance to rethink its urban landscape. To maximize its impact, policymakers must prioritize the following:

• Network Connectivity: Fill gaps in the bike network, such as Central Park West, Lafayette Street, and key Manhattan corridors.
• Protected Routes: Expand lanes into high-traffic neighborhoods, including Downtown Brooklyn and Harlem, and provide safe connections between bridges and bike paths.
• Multimodal Integration: Combine efforts to improve pedestrian infrastructure with cycling enhancements, ensuring safer and more efficient street use for all.

The Correlation Between Traffic Volume and Cyclist Safety

The expected reduction in vehicle volume from congestion pricing could save lives. Historical data shows that cyclist fatalities and injuries are disproportionately high in areas with heavy motor vehicle traffic. Conversely, when vehicle volume decreases, cycling becomes safer, as seen in London and Stockholm.

By leveraging congestion pricing to expand and improve bike infrastructure, NYC can reduce these risks and encourage more residents to adopt cycling as a sustainable, healthy transportation option.

Conclusion

Congestion pricing represents more than just a tool to manage traffic; it is an opportunity to transform NYC’s streets into safer, more equitable spaces for cyclists. With thoughtful investment in protected bike lanes and network connectivity, the city can reduce cyclist injuries and fatalities while promoting sustainable transportation. For a metropolis that prides itself on progress, embracing this vision is not just beneficial—it’s necessary.